Review



hcov 229e  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    ATCC hcov 229e
    Identification of host factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 <t>and</t> <t>HCoV-229E</t> replication (A) Schematic overview of the siRNA screening. HEK293 A/T cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected twice with siRNAs targeting 91 host genes previously identified as being involved in influenza virus replication. Cells were then infected with SARS-CoV-2 (100 plaque-forming unit [PFU]/100 μL) one day after the second transfection. Supernatants were collected at 2 days post-infection (dpi) and titrated by plaque assay. (B) Results of the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen. The 91 host factors were divided into four batches, each including a non-targeting siRNA as a negative control (N) and siRNA targeting SARS-CoV-2 nsp12 as a positive control (P). Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and its corresponding negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. (C) The seven host factors identified in the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen were further examined in HCoV-229E, along with the negative control siRNA (N) and positive control siRNA (P) targeting the HCoV-229E N gene. Following the same method described in (A), MRC-5 cells were infected with HCoV-229E (50 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 )/100 μL). Supernatants were collected at 3 dpi and titrated by TCID 50 assay. Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and the negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D) Cell viability was measured in duplicate wells across two independent experiments using CellTiter-Glo following siRNA transfection. See also and .
    Hcov 229e, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 322 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/coronavirus+229e+hcov+strain+229e+atcc+vr/Human+coronavirus+229E%3B+Strain%3A+229E/pmc12930041-16-0-2
    Average 96 stars, based on 322 article reviews
    hcov 229e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of antisense oligonucleotides targeting GBF1 against SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses"

    Article Title: Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of antisense oligonucleotides targeting GBF1 against SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses

    Journal: iScience

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.114851

    Identification of host factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E replication (A) Schematic overview of the siRNA screening. HEK293 A/T cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected twice with siRNAs targeting 91 host genes previously identified as being involved in influenza virus replication. Cells were then infected with SARS-CoV-2 (100 plaque-forming unit [PFU]/100 μL) one day after the second transfection. Supernatants were collected at 2 days post-infection (dpi) and titrated by plaque assay. (B) Results of the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen. The 91 host factors were divided into four batches, each including a non-targeting siRNA as a negative control (N) and siRNA targeting SARS-CoV-2 nsp12 as a positive control (P). Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and its corresponding negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. (C) The seven host factors identified in the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen were further examined in HCoV-229E, along with the negative control siRNA (N) and positive control siRNA (P) targeting the HCoV-229E N gene. Following the same method described in (A), MRC-5 cells were infected with HCoV-229E (50 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 )/100 μL). Supernatants were collected at 3 dpi and titrated by TCID 50 assay. Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and the negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D) Cell viability was measured in duplicate wells across two independent experiments using CellTiter-Glo following siRNA transfection. See also and .
    Figure Legend Snippet: Identification of host factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E replication (A) Schematic overview of the siRNA screening. HEK293 A/T cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected twice with siRNAs targeting 91 host genes previously identified as being involved in influenza virus replication. Cells were then infected with SARS-CoV-2 (100 plaque-forming unit [PFU]/100 μL) one day after the second transfection. Supernatants were collected at 2 days post-infection (dpi) and titrated by plaque assay. (B) Results of the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen. The 91 host factors were divided into four batches, each including a non-targeting siRNA as a negative control (N) and siRNA targeting SARS-CoV-2 nsp12 as a positive control (P). Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and its corresponding negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. (C) The seven host factors identified in the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen were further examined in HCoV-229E, along with the negative control siRNA (N) and positive control siRNA (P) targeting the HCoV-229E N gene. Following the same method described in (A), MRC-5 cells were infected with HCoV-229E (50 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 )/100 μL). Supernatants were collected at 3 dpi and titrated by TCID 50 assay. Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and the negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D) Cell viability was measured in duplicate wells across two independent experiments using CellTiter-Glo following siRNA transfection. See also and .

    Techniques Used: Transfection, Virus, Infection, Plaque Assay, Negative Control, Positive Control, Standard Deviation

    Related Articles

    Virus:

    Article Title:
    Article Snippet: .. RVP Outputs on Simulated Samples Representing Rare Respiratory Viruses: Virus Strain Overall RVP Output (648 outputs per sample) Parainfluenza 4 Type 4 Strain M-25 ATCC VR-1378 647 / 648 negative calls** Coronavirus HKU1 Transcript (similar to HKU1 strain N18 genotype A (DQ415914)) 647 / 648 negative calls*** Coronavirus 229E HcoV Strain 229E ATCC VR-740 648 / 648 negative calls Coronavirus OC43 HcoV Strain OC43 ATCC VR-1558 648 / 648 negative calls Coronavirus NL63 HcoV Strain NL63 In-House 642 / 648 negative calls* *Contamination of 1 sample during the pre-analytical step – contaminant reproducibly detected in all six replicates prepared from total extracted nucleic acid as either equivocal or low positive result just above the cutoff. ..



    Similar Products

    96
    ATCC hcov 229e
    Identification of host factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 <t>and</t> <t>HCoV-229E</t> replication (A) Schematic overview of the siRNA screening. HEK293 A/T cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected twice with siRNAs targeting 91 host genes previously identified as being involved in influenza virus replication. Cells were then infected with SARS-CoV-2 (100 plaque-forming unit [PFU]/100 μL) one day after the second transfection. Supernatants were collected at 2 days post-infection (dpi) and titrated by plaque assay. (B) Results of the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen. The 91 host factors were divided into four batches, each including a non-targeting siRNA as a negative control (N) and siRNA targeting SARS-CoV-2 nsp12 as a positive control (P). Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and its corresponding negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. (C) The seven host factors identified in the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen were further examined in HCoV-229E, along with the negative control siRNA (N) and positive control siRNA (P) targeting the HCoV-229E N gene. Following the same method described in (A), MRC-5 cells were infected with HCoV-229E (50 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 )/100 μL). Supernatants were collected at 3 dpi and titrated by TCID 50 assay. Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and the negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D) Cell viability was measured in duplicate wells across two independent experiments using CellTiter-Glo following siRNA transfection. See also and .
    Hcov 229e, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/coronavirus+229e+hcov+strain+229e+atcc+vr/Human+coronavirus+229E%3B+Strain%3A+229E/pmc12930041-16-0-2
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hcov 229e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC coronavirus 229e hcov strain 229e atcc vr
    Identification of host factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 <t>and</t> <t>HCoV-229E</t> replication (A) Schematic overview of the siRNA screening. HEK293 A/T cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected twice with siRNAs targeting 91 host genes previously identified as being involved in influenza virus replication. Cells were then infected with SARS-CoV-2 (100 plaque-forming unit [PFU]/100 μL) one day after the second transfection. Supernatants were collected at 2 days post-infection (dpi) and titrated by plaque assay. (B) Results of the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen. The 91 host factors were divided into four batches, each including a non-targeting siRNA as a negative control (N) and siRNA targeting SARS-CoV-2 nsp12 as a positive control (P). Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and its corresponding negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. (C) The seven host factors identified in the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen were further examined in HCoV-229E, along with the negative control siRNA (N) and positive control siRNA (P) targeting the HCoV-229E N gene. Following the same method described in (A), MRC-5 cells were infected with HCoV-229E (50 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 )/100 μL). Supernatants were collected at 3 dpi and titrated by TCID 50 assay. Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and the negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D) Cell viability was measured in duplicate wells across two independent experiments using CellTiter-Glo following siRNA transfection. See also and .
    Coronavirus 229e Hcov Strain 229e Atcc Vr, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/coronavirus+229e+hcov+strain+229e+atcc+vr/Human+coronavirus+229E/fda_document____cdrh_docs_slash_reviews_slash_k063765-241-47-52
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    coronavirus 229e hcov strain 229e atcc vr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC 648 negative calls coronavirus oc43 hcov strain oc43 atcc vr
    Identification of host factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 <t>and</t> <t>HCoV-229E</t> replication (A) Schematic overview of the siRNA screening. HEK293 A/T cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected twice with siRNAs targeting 91 host genes previously identified as being involved in influenza virus replication. Cells were then infected with SARS-CoV-2 (100 plaque-forming unit [PFU]/100 μL) one day after the second transfection. Supernatants were collected at 2 days post-infection (dpi) and titrated by plaque assay. (B) Results of the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen. The 91 host factors were divided into four batches, each including a non-targeting siRNA as a negative control (N) and siRNA targeting SARS-CoV-2 nsp12 as a positive control (P). Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and its corresponding negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. (C) The seven host factors identified in the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen were further examined in HCoV-229E, along with the negative control siRNA (N) and positive control siRNA (P) targeting the HCoV-229E N gene. Following the same method described in (A), MRC-5 cells were infected with HCoV-229E (50 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 )/100 μL). Supernatants were collected at 3 dpi and titrated by TCID 50 assay. Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and the negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D) Cell viability was measured in duplicate wells across two independent experiments using CellTiter-Glo following siRNA transfection. See also and .
    648 Negative Calls Coronavirus Oc43 Hcov Strain Oc43 Atcc Vr, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/coronavirus+229e+hcov+strain+229e+atcc+vr/Human+coronavirus+229E/fda_document____cdrh_docs_slash_reviews_slash_k063765-241-55-64
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    648 negative calls coronavirus oc43 hcov strain oc43 atcc vr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC strain hcov 229e virus
    Identification of host factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 <t>and</t> <t>HCoV-229E</t> replication (A) Schematic overview of the siRNA screening. HEK293 A/T cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected twice with siRNAs targeting 91 host genes previously identified as being involved in influenza virus replication. Cells were then infected with SARS-CoV-2 (100 plaque-forming unit [PFU]/100 μL) one day after the second transfection. Supernatants were collected at 2 days post-infection (dpi) and titrated by plaque assay. (B) Results of the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen. The 91 host factors were divided into four batches, each including a non-targeting siRNA as a negative control (N) and siRNA targeting SARS-CoV-2 nsp12 as a positive control (P). Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and its corresponding negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. (C) The seven host factors identified in the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen were further examined in HCoV-229E, along with the negative control siRNA (N) and positive control siRNA (P) targeting the HCoV-229E N gene. Following the same method described in (A), MRC-5 cells were infected with HCoV-229E (50 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 )/100 μL). Supernatants were collected at 3 dpi and titrated by TCID 50 assay. Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and the negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D) Cell viability was measured in duplicate wells across two independent experiments using CellTiter-Glo following siRNA transfection. See also and .
    Strain Hcov 229e Virus, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/coronavirus+229e+hcov+strain+229e+atcc+vr/Human+coronavirus+229E%3B+Strain%3A+229E/bio_rxiv__2025__07__24__666517-222-2-5
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    strain hcov 229e virus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC hcov strain 229e
    Figure 2. (A) Sequences of AH peptides used for the screening of the binders toward the <t>HCoV-229E</t> virus. X denotes norleucine used instead of methionine in the wild sequence (Table S1). (B) Chemical structure of M2-NR. (C) Fluorescence response of the AH peptide conjugated with the NR unit (2.0 μM) for 1.7 × 109 particles/mL HCoV-229E virus. Measurements were performed in PBS buffer at 25 °C with excitation at 552 nm. Analysis, 640 nm.
    Hcov Strain 229e, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/coronavirus+229e+hcov+strain+229e+atcc+vr/Human+coronavirus+229E%3B+Strain%3A+229E/pm39840494-84-1-14
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hcov strain 229e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    ATCC atcc hcov 229e reference strain
    Figure 2. (A) Sequences of AH peptides used for the screening of the binders toward the <t>HCoV-229E</t> virus. X denotes norleucine used instead of methionine in the wild sequence (Table S1). (B) Chemical structure of M2-NR. (C) Fluorescence response of the AH peptide conjugated with the NR unit (2.0 μM) for 1.7 × 109 particles/mL HCoV-229E virus. Measurements were performed in PBS buffer at 25 °C with excitation at 552 nm. Analysis, 640 nm.
    Atcc Hcov 229e Reference Strain, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/coronavirus+229e+hcov+strain+229e+atcc+vr/Human+coronavirus+229E/pm39038394-70-11-11
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    atcc hcov 229e reference strain - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Identification of host factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E replication (A) Schematic overview of the siRNA screening. HEK293 A/T cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected twice with siRNAs targeting 91 host genes previously identified as being involved in influenza virus replication. Cells were then infected with SARS-CoV-2 (100 plaque-forming unit [PFU]/100 μL) one day after the second transfection. Supernatants were collected at 2 days post-infection (dpi) and titrated by plaque assay. (B) Results of the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen. The 91 host factors were divided into four batches, each including a non-targeting siRNA as a negative control (N) and siRNA targeting SARS-CoV-2 nsp12 as a positive control (P). Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and its corresponding negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. (C) The seven host factors identified in the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen were further examined in HCoV-229E, along with the negative control siRNA (N) and positive control siRNA (P) targeting the HCoV-229E N gene. Following the same method described in (A), MRC-5 cells were infected with HCoV-229E (50 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 )/100 μL). Supernatants were collected at 3 dpi and titrated by TCID 50 assay. Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and the negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D) Cell viability was measured in duplicate wells across two independent experiments using CellTiter-Glo following siRNA transfection. See also and .

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of antisense oligonucleotides targeting GBF1 against SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.114851

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Identification of host factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-229E replication (A) Schematic overview of the siRNA screening. HEK293 A/T cells were seeded in 24-well plates and transfected twice with siRNAs targeting 91 host genes previously identified as being involved in influenza virus replication. Cells were then infected with SARS-CoV-2 (100 plaque-forming unit [PFU]/100 μL) one day after the second transfection. Supernatants were collected at 2 days post-infection (dpi) and titrated by plaque assay. (B) Results of the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen. The 91 host factors were divided into four batches, each including a non-targeting siRNA as a negative control (N) and siRNA targeting SARS-CoV-2 nsp12 as a positive control (P). Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and its corresponding negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. (C) The seven host factors identified in the SARS-CoV-2 siRNA screen were further examined in HCoV-229E, along with the negative control siRNA (N) and positive control siRNA (P) targeting the HCoV-229E N gene. Following the same method described in (A), MRC-5 cells were infected with HCoV-229E (50 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 )/100 μL). Supernatants were collected at 3 dpi and titrated by TCID 50 assay. Viral titers were calculated based on the difference between each siRNA and the negative control. Each dot represents the mean of duplicate wells from a single independent experiment. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D) Cell viability was measured in duplicate wells across two independent experiments using CellTiter-Glo following siRNA transfection. See also and .

    Article Snippet: HCoV-229E , ATCC , VR-740.

    Techniques: Transfection, Virus, Infection, Plaque Assay, Negative Control, Positive Control, Standard Deviation

    Figure 2. (A) Sequences of AH peptides used for the screening of the binders toward the HCoV-229E virus. X denotes norleucine used instead of methionine in the wild sequence (Table S1). (B) Chemical structure of M2-NR. (C) Fluorescence response of the AH peptide conjugated with the NR unit (2.0 μM) for 1.7 × 109 particles/mL HCoV-229E virus. Measurements were performed in PBS buffer at 25 °C with excitation at 552 nm. Analysis, 640 nm.

    Journal: Analytical chemistry

    Article Title: Viral Membrane-Targeting Amphipathic Helical Peptide-Based Fluorogenic Probes for the Analysis of Infectious Titers of Enveloped Viruses.

    doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04852

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. (A) Sequences of AH peptides used for the screening of the binders toward the HCoV-229E virus. X denotes norleucine used instead of methionine in the wild sequence (Table S1). (B) Chemical structure of M2-NR. (C) Fluorescence response of the AH peptide conjugated with the NR unit (2.0 μM) for 1.7 × 109 particles/mL HCoV-229E virus. Measurements were performed in PBS buffer at 25 °C with excitation at 552 nm. Analysis, 640 nm.

    Article Snippet: The HCoV strain 229E was obtained as shown in the literature or purchased from ATCC (VR-740).

    Techniques: Virus, Sequencing, Fluorescence

    Figure 3. (A) Fluorescence spectra of M2-NR (2.0 μM) in the absence and presence of 1.7 × 109 particles/mL HCoV-229E. The response to 1.7 × 109 particles/mL AAV-2 is also shown. (B) Effect of protease K (0.1 mg/mL) or Triton-X (0.1%) treatment on the fluorescence response of M2- NR (2.0 μM) to 1.7 × 109 particles/mL HCoV-229E. (C) Fluorescence response of M2-NR (2.0 μM) to serially diluted HCoV-229E (0−1.7 × 109 particles/mL). Excitation, 552 nm. Analysis, 640 nm. Temperature, 25 °C.

    Journal: Analytical chemistry

    Article Title: Viral Membrane-Targeting Amphipathic Helical Peptide-Based Fluorogenic Probes for the Analysis of Infectious Titers of Enveloped Viruses.

    doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04852

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. (A) Fluorescence spectra of M2-NR (2.0 μM) in the absence and presence of 1.7 × 109 particles/mL HCoV-229E. The response to 1.7 × 109 particles/mL AAV-2 is also shown. (B) Effect of protease K (0.1 mg/mL) or Triton-X (0.1%) treatment on the fluorescence response of M2- NR (2.0 μM) to 1.7 × 109 particles/mL HCoV-229E. (C) Fluorescence response of M2-NR (2.0 μM) to serially diluted HCoV-229E (0−1.7 × 109 particles/mL). Excitation, 552 nm. Analysis, 640 nm. Temperature, 25 °C.

    Article Snippet: The HCoV strain 229E was obtained as shown in the literature or purchased from ATCC (VR-740).

    Techniques: Fluorescence

    Figure 4. (A) Linear relationship between the HCoV-229E particle concentration (particles/mL) by the M2-NR response and the virus titer based on the TCID50 assay. (B) Comparison of the virus titer calculated by an M2-NR fluorescence assay and those determined by TCID50 assay; [M2-NR] = 2.0 μM.

    Journal: Analytical chemistry

    Article Title: Viral Membrane-Targeting Amphipathic Helical Peptide-Based Fluorogenic Probes for the Analysis of Infectious Titers of Enveloped Viruses.

    doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04852

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. (A) Linear relationship between the HCoV-229E particle concentration (particles/mL) by the M2-NR response and the virus titer based on the TCID50 assay. (B) Comparison of the virus titer calculated by an M2-NR fluorescence assay and those determined by TCID50 assay; [M2-NR] = 2.0 μM.

    Article Snippet: The HCoV strain 229E was obtained as shown in the literature or purchased from ATCC (VR-740).

    Techniques: Concentration Assay, Virus, TCID50 Assay, Comparison, Fluorescence

    Figure 5. (A) Fluorescence response of M2-NR to serially diluted virus (HCoV-229EHuh‑7, IAV, HSV-1, or VSV-G LV). (B) Comparison of the virus titer (HCoV-229EHuh‑7 (TCID50/mL), IAV (TCID50/mL), HSV (TCID50/mL), or VSV-G LV (IFU/mL)), calculated by the M2-NR fluorescence assay and those determined by cell-based assays; [M2-NR] = 2.0 μM.

    Journal: Analytical chemistry

    Article Title: Viral Membrane-Targeting Amphipathic Helical Peptide-Based Fluorogenic Probes for the Analysis of Infectious Titers of Enveloped Viruses.

    doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c04852

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. (A) Fluorescence response of M2-NR to serially diluted virus (HCoV-229EHuh‑7, IAV, HSV-1, or VSV-G LV). (B) Comparison of the virus titer (HCoV-229EHuh‑7 (TCID50/mL), IAV (TCID50/mL), HSV (TCID50/mL), or VSV-G LV (IFU/mL)), calculated by the M2-NR fluorescence assay and those determined by cell-based assays; [M2-NR] = 2.0 μM.

    Article Snippet: The HCoV strain 229E was obtained as shown in the literature or purchased from ATCC (VR-740).

    Techniques: Fluorescence, Virus, Comparison